Testimony on the unequal burden pollution places upon poor and minority communities.
Destiny Watford rejects the planned Energy Answers Incinerator for Curtis Bay
Destiny Watford, Free Your Voice, speaks out against plans to bring the Energy Answers incinerator to Curtis Bay, an industrial area of Baltimore, Maryland. Watford stated that the plant would be within a mile of two schools and would discharge lead and mercury into the area which is already heavily polluted by industry.
Watford pointed out that the incinerator would not burn refuse from Baltimore, but would be importing fuel from other areas.
Watford won a prestigious environmental award for leading opposition to the planned plant which has not been built.
Chris Yoder testifies that socializing the costs of pollution violates conservative values
Dr. Alfred Bartlett asks MDE to strengthen regulations on coal burning power plants to better protect our health.
Miranda Kosten testifies to protect children in Maryland from air pollution
Transition to clean energy
Tricia Sheehan, Mom’s Clean Air Force, talks about how her child and thousands of other children fight for breath because of air pollution
The Other Bombardment of Baltimore
A recent study from MIT estimates that pollution from coal fired power plants kill 1885 people a year in Maryland. In Baltimore, the study estimates that we dig 475 early graves each year for those who succumb to pollution from coal plants. Oh, say, the number of Americans killed during the Battle of Baltimore? 28. So where is our song for the 475 who lose their fight against coal plant pollution every year? In a city where we are grieving 182 murders, these 475 silent deaths go unseen, with no sirens, no blue lights, no detectives searching for the culprits. The cause of death or hospitalization will be listed as pulmonary failure, stroke, asthma, heart attack. The smoke plumes waving in the distance are unquestioned. The costs of care and suffering falls upon those who are unable to withstand the pollution, not to those who created it.
Remember how states took cigarette companies to court to reclaim medical costs due to cancer? If King Tobacco was required to pay for the damage it wreaks, why are aging, highly polluting coal burning plants still polluting for free? Why are we choosing to give a competitive advantage to plants which don’t purchase and use pollution controls over ones that do? Or over renewable energy sources which don’t pollute? What kind of capitalism is that?
Sure we need to meet our energy needs, but subsidizing inefficient and highly polluting power plants with our health and environment is unethical and unproductive. Here are some better ideas:
The Maryland Public Service Commission recently set a goal of saving 1.2 million megawatt hours of electricity per year. According to Mike Tidwell at Chesapeake Climate Action Network, meeting these goals would eliminated the need for a 460 megawatt coal fired power plant every two years.
Helping businesses and homeowners conserve energy enables us to reduce pollution while reducing energy bills for businesses and consumers.
Increasing renewable sources of energy like solar, wind and geothermal further reduce pollution while meeting our energy goals. Maryland needs to move quickly to escape it’s dependency on highly polluting coal fired power plants so we can improve the health of our citizens, our environment and our economy.
Holding our Breath for Better Air Quality Regulations
The new standards would push companies to meet emission standards at each plant and require plants to use pollution control equipment
throughout the summer smog season. The council put off their vote on adopting the standards until October.
The full report by MDE is listed in the resource section of the website.
There will be a Stakeholder meeting (open to the public) at 10am on Wednesday, Sept. 10th at the Maryland Department of the Environment Office
1800 Washington Blvd.
Baltimore, MD 21230
Toll free at 1-800-633-6101
The next meeting of the AQCAC will be on October 6th at 8 am.