The New Scientific Breakthroughs:
How and Who
When we list our most important scientific breakthroughs, we usually note the discoveries of new evidence: ancient bones, DNA, black holes and medicines.
But could our biggest recent breakthrough be not what have found, but how we collaborate in our research?
There is a new paradigm for scientific research that could change how we study, what we study, and whether our research is useful in solving the problems it identified.
Community research grants offer communities and organizations a collaborative role in researching health and social problems, training in scientific investigations, and a shared communication of the results and implications of these studies. For communities, which have never been offered a role in research studies other than unpaid lab rats, this is a big deal.
These partnerships can help communities develop research and design interventions to improve the lives of their members and clients. For scientists, these partnerships offer keen insights into the social, economic and cultural factors which affect these issues and ongoing access to these programs for follow up research opportunities which can test the effect of interventions as they are implemented over time.
My favorite opportunity for these grants is at K-12 schools where students and college researchers could collaborate on issues which affect the health and learning of students, their families and communities. These collaborations could help enrich the science curriculum, develop mentoring partnerships that create bridges to colleges, and help schools become a locus for building healthy communities.
I love science and scientists, but I will not miss the high holy research design where lab coats and equipment appeared and disappeared without a trace save for a mention in a scientific journal or conference. The job of science is to create better understanding and better outcomes. When it descends from the tower of science, it is a valuable tool of positive social change.
I’m excited to see what we will learn, when we are learning together.
If a school or business wants to boost productivity and performance, the answer may be hiding, invisibly, right under their noses. And in their lungs.
That’s right, air. According to The COGfx Study by the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Syracuse University Center of Excellence, and SUNY Upstate Medical School, increasing the supply of clean air may boost cognitive functions—how we learn and make decisions– by over 100 percent.
The largest improvements were found in three domains:
Crisis Response: 131% Strategy: 288% and Information Usage: 299%.
(Note:Any thoughts on where we could use some brain boosting ventilation? White House? Pentagon? Tweet Room?)
The study compared the levels of Co2, VOC’s (volatile organic compounds) and ventilation in convention building conditions, green buildings, and green with enhanced ventilation.
The study showed a 61 % increase in cognitive function in green buildings compared to conventional buildings, and a 101% increase in cognitive function in Green buildings with enhanced ventilation.
Granted, this is a small study in a controlled office environment. But these large effects should start us thinking about our opportunities to improve the performance of those who learn, work and live in our buildings.
What would it be worth to flip a switch and significantly improve the cognitive performance of the students at your school or the employees at your business?
In a March 2017 presentation at the NFTM conference in Baltimore, Christopher Walinski of Munich Reinsurance, America, discussed how his team is applying enhanced ventilation to an office area on their campus in New Jersey. The team has reduced energy use at their campus by 50% since 2007, and they are using occupancy sensors to manage the additional ventilation efficiently. The team is using plants in area planters and green cleaning to help lower VOC levels.
This work is not a study and they are not collecting data on occupant performance, but occupant comments have been positive. They are tracking the lowering of the Co2 levels (average of 514 in the test space vs 655 in similar office areas). The team expects to expand this enhanced ventilation to more areas on their campus in the future. They may be creating a template for other building managers to follow as they look to improve the productivity and health of their occupants.
In a second study, Cogfx2, the researchers examined ten office buildings in five cities and found that high performing, green certified buildings outperformed high performing, uncertified buildings.
- 4% higher cognitive test scores in high-performing, green certified buildings.
- 4% higher Sleep Quality scores in high-performing, green certified buildings.
- 30% fewer symptoms in high-performing, green certified buildings.
- Thermal comfort and sleep quality associated with higher cognitive scores
Read the report: http://naturalleader.com/thecogfxstudy/study-2/view-the-report
As we looked for the cause of bad decisions and poor performance, our first question has been
“What were you smoking?!”
With what we are learning about cognitive function and ventilation, our second question should be
“What were you breathing?”
Learning events are bright and wonderful–I find myself running about like a child with a butterfly net, trying to capture new ideas and brilliant insights. Here are a few that I’ve caught for... READ MORE
Baltimore WordPress Camp It is a joy to see people teaching and learning together. The recent Baltimore WordPress Camp in Baltimore, Maryland was a great example of shared learning. My favorite part... READ MORE
Students at Patterson High School and Baltimore Polytechnic Institute are about to get new science and environmental health laboratories: their schools. A Community Research Grant from Johns Hopkins will fund our joint effort... READ MORE